View all publications
View All
07Dec
2015

Quebec Councillor Disqualified for Municipal Contract

In British Columbia local elected officials who consider our “ethical conduct” rules to be unduly onerous might take some comfort from a recent Québec Court of Appeal decision, from which the Supreme Court of Canada has just refused leave to appeal. Keith McKinnon was elected a councillor of the Municipality of St-Augustin on December 12 of 2010. About two years previously, McKinnon’s company had entered into a passenger transportation contract with the municipality that involved the use of a hovercraft to cross the St-Augustin River in northeast Québec. Under the municipal elections legislation, a person who, during his term of office as a municipal councillor, knowingly has a direct or indirect interest in a contract with the municipality is (subject to certain exceptions) disqualified from holding elected office in any municipality in the province. This is a much more onerous rule than the contract disclosure and conflict of interest rules that apply to B.C. local elected officials under s. 107 of the Community Charter; in this province, a councillor may have a contract with the municipality if it is disclosed and the councillor doesn’t vote on it. The Québec Attorney-General’s application to have the councillor disqualified was denied in the Superior Court, but allowed in the Court of Appeal.

Download pdf: Quebec Councillor Disqualified for Municipal Contract

Contributing Lawyers:

Browse Client Bulletins

Stay Connected